Tammy Everts on how many sites fail to implement basic performance-enhancing techniques
The first-ever broad study of European ecommerce websites has found that one in three of Europe’s top retail sites fail to meet the performance demands of online shoppers.
While web performance has gained traction in North America over the past few years, it's still an emerging topic worldwide, making it a challenge to convince site owners outside the U.S. that performance is a critical business issue.
My company Radware studied the page speed and composition of 400 top European retailers, as ranked by Internet Retailer magazine, to see how these sites performed for visitors using Chrome 23 - the most popular browser in the EU at the time of testing - via the test server in Amsterdam. (We chose the Amsterdam location because it allowed us to test across all major browsers.)
While our findings, which were released in this report, may not be shocking if you’ve been paying close attention to the performance space, they may come as an eye-opener to other retailers.
Finding 1: most web pages are too slow
The median load time for first-time visitors was 7.04 seconds. Depending on who you ask, the average internet user expects web pages to load in less than three seconds, two seconds, or even 400 milliseconds. The last time the average person reported being OK with a seven-second wait was circa 2001.
Finding 2: one in four sites took over 10 seconds to load
If you take a closer look at the histogram above, you’ll get a more nuanced picture of how many sites fared. A significant number of sites performed much more poorly than 7.04 seconds. A total of 24 per cent of sites took more than 10 seconds to load while 8 per cent took 15 seconds or more.
Finding 3: pages are slow because they contain a lot of resources
Each of these resources represents one server round trip that's needed to pull all the page’s resources to the user’s browser, and each of these requests poses a small latency penalty. More round trips typically equals more latency and increased page render times.
Images and third-party scripts are the primary contributors to page bloat. Images account for more than half of a page’s total payload, while third-party scripts, such as ads, page analytics, and social sharing buttons, are the fastest-growing area of page growth.
Finding 4: many leading sites have failed to implement core performance best practices
Four out of five sites don't use a CDN, despite the benefits of doing so: CDNs cache page resources closer to end users, allowing resources to make shorter round trips and speed up rendering.
We also found that many sites were missing out on opportunities to make their pages faster through two core performance techniques:
- Text compression – one in five sites failed to implement compression
- Keepalives – one in 10 sites didn't use keepalives
Text compression and keepalives are considered “low-hanging fruit” on the performance optimisation tree. Implementing both can improve start render time by up to 52 per cent and load time by up to 31 per cent. You can learn more about these techniques here.
Why you should care about these findings
I may be pointing out the obvious, but I’ll say it anyway: internet user expectations are universal. Users in the EU don't have lower performance expectations than users in North America. These findings should be a wake-up call for European site owners. (Not that North American site owners should rest easy. Last fall, we found that the median US commerce home page took almost seven seconds to load.)
As the first-ever broad survey of major ecommerce sites, this report can be used as a lever for introducing the topic of performance optimization within your organisation. It will also serve as a benchmarking device as we continue to measure and track European ecommerce performance.