Adobe Premiere Pro vs Apple’s Final Cut Pro X – it's a question asked by many who are looking to get started with video editing. Two of the best video editing software packages money can buy, both contain professional-grade video editing tools that are so powerful they’ve been used to edit big movie blockbusters.
In this article we’ll take a closer look at Adobe Premiere Pro vs Apple’s Final Cut Pro X, exploring the differences between the two softwares, which platforms they operate on, and how easy each is to learn. Plus, we’ll take a look at which other programs they work with, as well as other key features they contain, and the types of support and reliability they both offer so that you can make your mind up over which editor to choose.
Adobe Premiere Pro
Coming to Premiere Pro as a new user couldn’t be easier. Though the software opens up with all the bells and whistles, and may look complicated, it’s actually quite well parsed, keeping things streamlined. Upon first opening there’s an interactive guide that walks you through the software with precision. Not to mention the myriad available get-started video tutorials available on the Adobe website.
Premiere Pro benefits from fantastic workflow flexibility, a strong emphasis on team projects, powerful adjustment layers, and raw controls to keep footage looking its best, there’s a lot to love about this video editor. Its panel-based user interface maintains an organised workspace but is also fully customisable. Basic editing tools like track selection, trimming, and ripple or rolling edit functions lay the groundwork for Premiere Pro’s more detailed editing functions such as Lumetri Color for colour grading. In fact, the software works with a whole host of other Adobe software, too.
The integration with Adobe After Effects gives the ability to include effects processing. You can even render a video out of After Effects and bring it back in to Premiere Pro so that you’re editing like you would a normal piece of footage, only with animations or effects added.
As well as After Effects, Premiere Pro works seamlessly with many other of the Adobe suite titles including Audition for audio editing, Photoshop and Illustrator for working with image files, and Adobe Stock.Render times in Premiere Pro can take quite a long time, occasionally bigger, more complex projects have been known to flare up issues with content the software can’t read, or generating errors.
Premiere Pro uses Productions to increase organisation and synchronisation for multi-project workflows where there is a team of editors working on the same content. It’s a step-up in flexibility for multiple user workflow but it has some good benefits for independent editors that work alone, too. Renaming files and other media from within Premiere Pro will also see the media on the storage device renamed, and this works the other way around as well. That means there’s no confusion when it comes to backing up data, and less doubling-up on content, which, if you’re keen to minimise the storage footprint on your hard drive, is great news.
Apple Final Cut Pro X
This macOS-only video editor is fast, and easy to use, as you would expect from a company such as Apple, who gears their focus around the user experience. All complex editing functions are hidden initially which makes it much more approachable for beginner editors or those new to the software. This simple user interface means they can jump right in and start editing videos quickly. But the features and tools that are initially hidden can be easily opened and used on projects, so the software is no less sophisticated than its competitors.
However, for those that have edited on non-linear editors before it may be a little trickier to use. That’s because FCP X seems to function in reverse to a lot of the other editors out there, presumably in an attempt to keep editing workflows clear and smooth. So veteran editors that are new to FCP X may have to unlearn old habits.
FCP X is capable of editing projects to almost any level, but it’s not best-suited for complex video editing work that specifically requires a large volume of video tracks. FCP X feels like it resists projects that play with the chronology of a piece and instead is happier when working towards chronological editing (that is, a project that follows a narrative from beginning, to middle, and end). When a project is chronological the software seems to process much quicker than others. FCP X looks like it has thrown the preconceptions of previous editions of FCP out the window and revamped it in a powerful way that allows fast editing workflows, and has speedy render times even when working on large projects.
Although multiple editors can work on the same project via editing servers such as Jellyfish, collaboration with other users on projects still feels a little stilted and is not necessarily a smooth process. Though, if you’re a lone editor, this is not so much of an issue.
FCP X works in conjunction with Apple’s motion graphics and content delivery softwares, Motion and Compressor, though at an additional standalone cost. From here users can create 2D and 3D titles, transitions and real-time effects, as well as processing output content in myriad formats, including 360 degree output, as well.
Supported video and audio formats
Premiere Pro vs Final Cut Pro: Which video editor is right for you?
If you’re on macOS you might want to edit on Final Cut Pro X - it’s faster, optimised for the macOS operating system, and it renders with incredible speeds. But it all depends on your editing workflow. If you plan to edit complex projects which bounce back and forth throughout the timeline then Premiere Pro might be the better option, even if it may be slightly slower to render the files.
On Windows you have only one choice, because FCP X isn’t available on PC. This notwithstanding, it’s difficult to choose between the two softwares when comparing them independently of operating systems. Both video editing softwares are extremely powerful and, given to the right editor, are both equally capable.
Premiere Pro also benefits from the seamless integration with other apps in the Adobe suite including Photoshop, Illustrator, Audition, and Stock for a more cohesive experience which caters to the multimedia content creator.
It’s not necessarily a case of choosing one over the other because of a long list of features that one software has and the other does not. But it does matter if you’re editing specific types of projects, or prefer a certain workflow over another. Overall, the best way to figure out which video editor is right for you, is to download free trials of both software and try them before you buy, that way you can be certain of your purchase.