Designer's ‘fixed’ Marvel logo enrages fans

Allan Peters' Marvel logo redesign.
(Image credit: Allan Peters)

While I'm partial to a good rebrand, there are some logos that should never be touched, especially when there's a horde of bloodthirsty fans ready to tear any redesign to shreds. However, designer Allan Peters showed no fear when he recently attempted to "fix" the Marvel logo, and to say it was a divisive move would be an understatement.

Often, the best logos are iconic because of their simplicity, something that the Marvel logo embodies with its bold, yet understated design. Completely reinventing the logo, Peters' unique spin on the beloved design naturally ruffled some feathers, proving that creating something as simple as concept design can be a dangerous game to play.

Collaborating with designer and animator Nur Amirov, Peters set about 'fixing' the Marvel logo, explaining, "Marvel is a loved brand however I saw room for improvement with the logo itself. It is currently is lacking a story and it has no brand mark making so it doesn’t reduce well."

Taking a more graphic approach to the logo, Peters was inspired by the brand's physical comics, playing with angles to create an 'M' motif that mimics the pages of a book. Maintaining the bold look of the brand's wordmark, his logo design feels aeons away from Marvel's iconic logo – undoubtedly unique, but at what cost?

from

Fans soon flocked to the comments to share their opinion, with many stating the design didn't need to be fixed. "When you see the red rectangle with white text in the corner of your eye or as a tab on a comic book it’s instantly marvel - you’ve lost all of that with a generic logo," one user commented, while others felt the design appeared too "generic and corporate", like an "SAT Prep company" or a "a 90s construction business."

Over on Reddit, the scathing opinions continued, with users comparing the design to the Metro logo and Gmail icon. "It feels so… corporate. Almost Sterile. Doesn’t lend to the brand at all," one Redditor commented, while another claimed it had "Too much going on," and "Zero charm."

Redesigning any fan favourite design is always going to be a risk – take Jaguar's divisive rebrand as a prime example. Check out our collection of the most disastrous rebrands to see what we can learn from them.

Thank you for reading 5 articles this month* Join now for unlimited access

Enjoy your first month for just £1 / $1 / €1

*Read 5 free articles per month without a subscription

Join now for unlimited access

Try first month for just £1 / $1 / €1

Natalie Fear
Staff Writer

Natalie Fear is Creative Bloq's staff writer. With an eye for trending topics and a passion for internet culture, she brings you the latest in art and design news. Natalie also runs Creative Bloq’s Day in the Life series, spotlighting diverse talent across the creative industries. Outside of work, she loves all things literature and music (although she’s partial to a spot of TikTok brain rot). 

You must confirm your public display name before commenting

Please logout and then login again, you will then be prompted to enter your display name.