Towards the end of last year we brought you the news that Tesla had hit a major branding roadblock, with a judge ordering the EV manufacturer to rename its 'Autopilot' and 'Full Self-Driving' features.
A judge ruled that these names were misleading, implying that the cars can drive themselves. And Tesla was ordered to change them or face a sales ban in its most popular state, California. But now Tesla is hitting back at the ruling.
And now, in an unexpected twist, Tesla is suing the DMV, calling the ruling "factually wrong, legally flawed, and unconstitutional." In a new legal complaint, Tesla suggests the DMV "wrongfully and baselessly labels Tesla a false advertiser for marketing its industry-leading advanced driver-assistance systems(“ADAS”) under the brand names “Autopilot” and “Full-Self Driving Capability."
"Tesla made clear—and has always made clear—that they do not make Tesla vehicles autonomous, and that active driver supervision is required," the complaint adds.
In response to the legal challenge, the DMV tells CNBC, “An Administrative Law Judge found that Tesla broke state law by misleading consumers with the term ‘autopilot.’ Tesla agreed to stop this practice, and now they’re challenging it anyway. DMV is committed to protecting the traveling public and will defend the Administrative Law Judge’s findings and decision in court.”
Indeed, it's curious that Tesla is challenging a ruling that is has already complied with. The brand has changed the name of Full Self-Driving Capability, going for Full Self-Driving (Supervised). Meanwhile, the company's support web page now makes the following caveat when describing Autopilot: "Autopilot refers to a suite of advanced driver assistance features that are intended to make driving more convenient and less stressful. None of these features make Model Y fully autonomous or replace you as the driver."
You must confirm your public display name before commenting
Please logout and then login again, you will then be prompted to enter your display name.
