Trader Joe’s battles its own employees in logo dispute
They're going tote-to-tote in a battle of the bags.
Daily design news, reviews, how-tos and more, as picked by the editors.
You are now subscribed
Your newsletter sign-up was successful
Want to add more newsletters?
Five times a week
CreativeBloq
Your daily dose of creative inspiration: unmissable art, design and tech news, reviews, expert commentary and buying advice.
Once a week
By Design
The design newsletter from Creative Bloq, bringing you the latest news and inspiration from the worlds of graphic design, branding, typography and more.
Once a week
State of the Art
Our digital art newsletter is your go-to source for the latest news, trends, and inspiration from the worlds of art, illustration, 3D modelling, game design, animation, and beyond.
Seasonal (around events)
Brand Impact Awards
Make an impression. Sign up to learn more about this prestigious award scheme, which celebrates the best of branding.
US grocery store Trader Joe's has revived a legal battle against its own employee union over similar merchandise designs. While the case was dismissed in early 2024, a new ruling has granted the store's appeal for a retrial to settle the trademarked logo design battle.
Last year's dismissal saw the store accused by Judge Hernán Vera of attempting to "weaponize the legal system", with the company ordered to pay $112,622.12 in legal fees. While copyright disputes are always complicated, going after its own union marks an uncomfortable confrontation for Trader Joe's and its workers.
The legal dispute centres around merchandise sold by Trader Joe's United, including t-shirts, badges and a tote bag bearing the collective's logo. Featuring a fist holding a box cutter framed by red typography reading "Trader Joe's United", the design is allegedly "likely to cause consumer confusion,” according to the court filing, due to its similarity to the Trader Joe's wordmark.
Trader Joe's iconic tote bag has developed somewhat of a cult fashion following, so it's understandable that the brand would want to protect its merch. Despite granting permission to reopen the case, Judge Gabriel Sanchez wrote in the new ruling that a resolution was currently unclear, stating, "How a reasonable consumer might interpret the image of a raised fist holding a boxcutter is a question of fact that cannot be resolved at the pleading stage.”
For more creative news, check out these design disputes that shook the internet or take a look at the “essentially identical” logo that reignited a 40-year brand war.
Daily design news, reviews, how-tos and more, as picked by the editors.

Natalie Fear is Creative Bloq's staff writer. With an eye for trending topics and a passion for internet culture, she brings you the latest in art and design news. Natalie also runs Creative Bloq’s Day in the Life series, spotlighting diverse talent across the creative industries. Outside of work, she loves all things literature and music (although she’s partial to a spot of TikTok brain rot).
You must confirm your public display name before commenting
Please logout and then login again, you will then be prompted to enter your display name.